How funny am I?

Return_To_Innocence c

Return to innocence by Syed Touhid Hassan 2.0

Traits that are found in people who are considered humorous include: adaptability in communication, desire to make a positive impressions, orientation towards feeling/emotions, and being able to see the irony in a situation. There are advantages to being considered humorous; you are seen as socially attractive, a competent communicators, and you are probably less lonely. Students feel that teachers who appropriately use humor are more in touch with them, and workers view bosses who crack a few jokes as having a great immediacy.  When others laugh spontaneously at your jokes you can be assured that you have a sense of humor.

Before you broadcast your collection of puns and one-liners remember that believing you are funny doesn’t necessarily make you so.  There is a skill involved here. So how do you know if you are funny? The Humor Orientation Scale has been developed by a pair of West Virginia University researchers so you can rate your Humor Orientation or HO. Actually others rate it for you. Humor is not just the content of what you say, but also the manner of delivery. People who have high HO scores are perceived as being funnier than those with low HO scores, even when delivering the same jokes.

Finally, understanding the language and culture of your audience is crucial for being funny. One time I listened to an educational speaker who sprinkled his presentation with humor as a way of keeping audience attention. He bemoaned the time he presented in China. “I was using the same jokes and puns that always get a laugh, but the  people just sat there, deadpan,” he complained. “So I asked the translator if she was translating me word for word or restating the meaning in her own words. She admitted she was restating the meaning. That’s why it wasn’t funny.”

He failed to comprehend that jokes and puns don’t translate well and sometimes not at all. If the woman had repeated his speech word for word in Mandarin, it still wouldn’t have been funny. His Chinese audience might have thought his presentation full of nonsense. However, as he continued to whine about how the translator ruined his humor, he got a chuckle out of me.

Posted in communication, Laughter and humor, Writer's resource | Leave a comment

Writing satire


Having a fondness for satire, I savor that kind of humor. But, many readers stumble over it. I introduced my children to the pleasure of reading satire when they were young. While in grade school, my daughter delighted in the annotated versions of Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass. These “children’s” classics gave her insight into Lewis Carroll’s ironic views on education that many people miss. But, these books still had humor that a child could understand.

Satire takes more intelligence and a deeper than average exposure to culture to comprehend. The extra work to understand unspoken meaning behind spoken sarcasm actually seems to make us smarter. In a study in Israel, college students listening to complaints on a customer service line were able to come up with more creative solutions to problem if the complaint was delivered in a sarcastic tone of voice. University of Haifa psychologist, Simone Shamay-Tsoory noted that people’s ability to understand sarcasm is related their level of social cognition. She found the area of the brain responding to comments that means the opposite of what one is saying also enables us to recognize emotions and social issues. When people suffered damage to the prefrontal lobe, which controls executive processing, they have a harder time picking up sarcasm. The loss of ability to “get” a sarcastic remark may be the beginning of a brain disease.[1]

The best tactic is to have a mix of levels of humor. Include an average intelligence character that the others have to talk to and deal with to make it easier for your less erudite readers. If you expect people to understand allusions as part of the humor, the very act of having to look up the name will reduce the instant humor. Include  annotations in the sidebar (footnotes if that is not possible) to explain the real or fictional people, places and events. Even a very educated person from another culture in another country may not understand your allusions. And, why should we deny anyone the pleasure of comprehending satire?




Posted in Emotional intelligence, Sarcasm, Satire, Writer's resource | Tagged , | Leave a comment

A proper repartee

It’s not easy to write humor.

Write about what?

Southern-belle-civil-warThe group of women sat around a table, discussing their mother’s instructions on being a “Southern Lady. ” In their story telling manner they competed with each to relate the most outlandish piece of advice.

“I never could understand that bit about making sure I had on clean underwear before going on a car trip in case I was in an accident,” one drawled.

“Me neither,” agreed a second woman with a honeyed giggle. “If I were in a car crash and bleeding, I doubt anyone would be worried about how clean my underwear was.”

The first woman continued. “Still she would remind me every time we got in the car. Sometime she simply would insist that I go back in the house and put on another pair, but I would have none of that.”

“My mother would insist that I put on clean underwear, too,” a third woman chimed…

View original post 257 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The origins of optimism

Write about what?

Investing_money (1)Investing money cc-by-sa-2.0

Optimism and pessimism are not two distinct styles but rather ends of a continuum. At the optimistic end people expect only good events to happen to them. They concentrate on stimuli that indicates a rosy outlook and ignore warning signs of unpleasant possibilities. At the pessimistic end people expect bad events to happen to them and become preoccupied with signs that something is going wrong.  Recently we have been told the further one is on the optimistic side, without reaching the oblivious dysfunctional state of being unable to see any pitfalls, the better life is.  Look at the all the benefits that some psychological researchers claim to have found for people who are higher on the optimism scale; they are purportedly happier, healthier and make more money.

However, careful examination of these claims show that social support[1], health, higher income[2] and optimism are really…

View original post 487 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The four dimensions of character

571px-Color_discThere are no new stories. Today’s most popular books are built on the plots of stories that have existed for millennia. In the same manner today’s current personality assessments are built  on much older theories.  Sometime around 2400 years ago, the physician Hippocrates described his theory that human moods, emotions were caused by an excess or lack of basic body fluids. Too much blood and you became giddy and talkative, too little and you would become morose. Feeling lazy? Blame it on too much phlegm.  He probably borrowed the ideas from someone before him.

Although this was not a sound medical observation, the idea of four different personality types keeps reappearing.  And like artists using tempera paint (which comes from the same root word as temperament) people in the personality business keep painting four different factors, which they mix to obtain their spectrum of personalities.

Writers are in the personality business, because they create characters. So reviewing different variations of these four dimensions of personality can help you.  Basically, identify the major trait of your character, and find which other ones are likely to accompany it.

The four basic personalities according to Hippocrates:

Choleric –energetic, ambitious, aggressive, tyrannical.

Sanguine – charismatic, friendly, impulsive, self-indulgent.

Phlegmatic – observant, steady, calm, apathetic

Melancholic – independent, cautious, moody, depressed

In each case the list moves from the strengths, which we long for in the characters of our dreams, to the weaknesses. However, well-rounded character must have fsults. If you want to choose the strong points from more than one type, such as a character that is both energetic and charismatic, on the worse days this character will turn into a self-indulgent tyrant. But, then the tyrant can sometimes be tireless in attempts to accomplish great things. If you develop a wise character that is observant, calm and independent, when the problems are overwhelming the character may slip into suicidal thoughts and not care what happens to others. But the morose, depressed downer character may exhibit a streak of independence.

Finally, beware of basing your characters on any personality theories that only have positive traits. These are not true portraits of people and your characters will not seem plausible either.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Giving your hero a little help

lolly 2012 (3) c_edited-2Readers may be drawn to the impassioned, spirited, exciting and mercurial hero figure. In real life we often find of these  people over-emotional, high-strung, frenzied and hot-tempered. So this kind of protagonist needs a balancing factor. A good place to find the appropriate personality for the mentor or sidekick to assists your hero is in research on creativity in business. Creativity is no long the domain of eccentric inventors, impractical daydreamers, and those living in garrets on the edge of poverty. In the business community it has become a buzzword for bolstering a faltering company. But the wise sociologist realizes that creativity is strongly related to non-conformity. And, non-conformists rub many people the wrong way. The latest trend in innovation research tries to define the various creative styles that will support each other (and bolster the company’s bottom line). These are excellent resources to use as the basis of your characters.

For example, Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory describes Adaption and Innovation as styles of creativity. However, at close examination the different styles are related to levels of conformity/non-conformity.  This inventory scores people on a continuum ranging from working with the system to challenging the system. [1]

The Spontaneous approach is marked by freedom from constraint and traditions. It is an ADHD style that focuses on many goals at once, impatiently jumping from one thing to the other–the feeling approach to coming up with solutions to the major conflict in your story. (Consider the similarities with the ill-prepared character on a mission to right an injustice.)

The Conceptual approach is centered on formulating new ideas, different alternatives, innovative concepts, and creating an overall plan. This is the problem solving style of the thinking person. (Think of the highly intelligent, but eccentric private detective.)

The Normative approach requires putting new ideas into a familiar context, based on past experiences. People employing this approach need to know the consequences beforehand. This play-it-safe style is mostly conformist. These people follow rather than lead when it comes to original ideas, but these are the kind of people that end up in leadership positions. (For example, the police chief who just can’t see the possible answers that the private detective can in many mystery novels.)

The Methodical approach is not really creative at all but focused on proven solutions and creating order. However, a spontaneous or conceptual person people can become methodical and adopt a step-by-step procedure when it comes to testing their novel ideas. Or you can simply add a methodical sidekick with the detailed know-how to make the hero’s far out idea work.

Fahden’s & Namakkal’s research has led to profiles that identifies people as the Creator, who invents with the new idea, the Advancer who recognizes this far out idea as a possible solution, the Refiner who methodically figures out what the consequences are going to be, and finally the Executor who pays attention to all the details. [2] This group seems to work as well in producing new products in real life as it does in fiction for the elite criminals involved in a high-stakes heist or the core group intent on carrying out some covert activity.

No one is purely creative or purely uncreative, so no one fits completely into any category. Most people use all of these approaches at one time or the other when faced with the “major conflict,” but they show a definite preference of one type of approach. So feel free to have your protagonist switch their approach occasionally when it makes sense. In fact, this would be a good idea for all major characters, even your antagonist.

[1] Kirton, M.J. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, pp. 622 – 629.
[2] Fahden, A. & Namakkal, S. (1995), C.A.R.E. Carlson Learning Company, pp. 8-9
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The merits of fictional characters

The first in a series on characterization…

Write about what?


Having seen discussion boards in which people spend time arguing about the merits of fictional characters, I would assume that a number of readers prefer these imaginary people to real ones. Fictional characters may be braver, more beautiful, or have greater ingenuity than real people so it is easier to become attached to them. But the real advantage is they don’t talk back and readers can imagine them however they desire. But, the same is not true for the people who create the stories. I can attest to a number of times that authors have related incidents in which characters they have created refuse to behave in the manner that the author envisions.

Characters live in the author’s heads, sometimes ignore their directives and even argue with them as the author tries to capture them with words. These finite words are the only way that reading audience may become acquainted…

View original post 520 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Wilde words

The final blog on creating the writer’s voice

Write about what?


Sometime in the eighties I noticed a shift in the focus of television sitcoms–the humorous situation was gradually being replaced by humorous banter. Witty retorts were more important than amusing events. In fact, often the events would be minimal. The entire plot may have been based solely on the character’s illusions, often nothing happened but clever conversations. Sometime the events in comedies actually struck a painful nerve. But, the audiences continued to laugh as the actors cut each other down a notch with witty retorts.

This is not the first time that ‘witty’ words have been prized over plot. Oscar Wilde, a 19th century Irish writer and poet wrote many poems, essays, short stories and plays. However, other than the fame achieved through his one novel The Picture of Dorian Gray, and his hit play, The Importance of Being Ernest, Wilde is mainly known for his epigrams, wry observations…

View original post 352 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Playing musical words

Digging a little deeper into creating a unique voice…

Write about what?

stephs (4)One of the quickest ways to make your writing voice stand out from the crowd is to master the use of literary devices. Some devices are just fancy names for specific types of diction and syntax. For example, anastrophe is a type of hyperbaton in which the position of a single word is changed from the normal syntax for emphasis. It is also the formal name for the distinctive syntax that marked the speech of Yoda in Star Wars.

However, there are many more literary devices that have potential. These involve selecting words for their actual sounds, as the sloshing, crackling, twinkling onomatopoeia words. I fondly think of these as the ‘musical’ literary devices. Longer words, with many syllables ending in vowels, like onomatopoeia, sound elegant, while short consonant bound ones, such as slang, carry a cocky connotation. I’ve witnessed people discussing whether it is more important to be intelligent or smart. To…

View original post 352 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Deciding on a direction

Writing doesn’t just need to be organized; it needs to go somewhere.

Write about what?

TX_dallas b

“Say what you are going to say, say it, and finally say what you have said.” I don’t know how many times I’ve heard this rule for organizing the written word repeated in the educational realm. But rules are meant to be broken. Following this rule consistently will end up putting your readers to sleep. So many formulas to create structure in writing breed boredom instead. Good writing requires movement towards a goal, without being completely predictable.

There are multiple types of graphic organizers to assist the writer in brainstorming: such as branching, bridging, and bubbling. However, consider exactly how the reader would comprehend a composition if you wrote it with one central idea and all the related sub-ideas jutting out in different directions? This would be like constantly returning to home between every leg of a road trip. There is no way to get away from the fact that…

View original post 300 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment